The full-stack agency playbook for AI in Google Ads: data foundation, Smart Bidding, Performance Max, creative AI, audiences, and what comes next.
Manual Google Ads management in 2026 is like driving with the windshield covered. Google's AI evaluates billions of auction signals per second. No human, no matter how senior, can match that at scale.
That is the uncomfortable starting point for every agency conversation I have right now. Every week you treat Smart Bidding, Performance Max, or Responsive Search Ads as optional extras, the leverage gap widens.
Join the waitlist and get notified when the new AdLume is ready. It catches wasted ad spend automatically and optimises campaigns around the clock.
One email, on the day access opens. Nothing else, and you can leave the list with one click.
A few data points to set the stakes. Google's own published guidance and case studies point to measurable conversion lift when broad match is paired with Smart Bidding and when Ad Strength moves from Poor to Excellent. Industry surveys put AI tool adoption among marketing executives near four in five. The direction is documented. The execution quality is what separates accounts that compound returns from accounts that burn budget.
The punchline: AI in Google Ads is already the baseline. You are either running it with discipline or watching competitors compound the advantage week over week.
One warning before we go deeper. I am not going to sell you the "AI replaces your job" story, and I am not going to hand you a tool list with no opinion attached. AI amplifies agency expertise, it does not replace it. The agencies that win over the next two years stack automation on top of tight data, clean structure, and human strategy. The ones that get wrecked either refuse to touch AI or hand it the steering wheel with no guardrails.
This playbook walks through the full stack: data foundation, bidding, campaign types, creative, audiences, keywords, analytics, agency implementation, and what's coming next. If you are running €1k to €50k/month per account, this is written for you.
Before you touch Smart Bidding, Performance Max, or any shiny new feature, stop and audit your conversion tracking. This is the part nobody wants to read and everybody skips. It is also the single biggest reason AI experiments fail.
Google's AI is only as good as the signals you feed it. Garbage in, expensive garbage out.
Here is the non-negotiable baseline for any account running AI features.
Google Tag sitewide. Basic, still broken on roughly half the accounts I audit. Every page, every subdomain, correct container, correct events.
First-party data in a cookieless world. Third-party cookies are effectively dead for measurement. Your CRM, email list, offline conversions: that is the new fuel for AI targeting. If you have not mapped which first-party signals feed into Google Ads, that is step one.
GA4 integration. Linked correctly, GA4 gives Smart Bidding signals it cannot see from inside Google Ads alone. Scroll depth, engagement time, micro-conversions. All of it becomes bidding fuel.
Enhanced Conversions. Recovers conversion data lost to iOS privacy changes, ad blockers, and cookie restrictions. Without it, Smart Bidding is optimizing against an incomplete picture.
Offline Conversion Tracking (OCT). The single biggest lever for B2B lead gen. Feeding closed-deal data back rewires the bidding algorithm. Instead of optimizing for "form submit," it optimizes for "form submit that becomes a signed contract." Completely different optimization target.
Consent Mode v2. Mandatory for any EU or UK advertiser. Without it you are in GDPR exposure territory and losing modeled conversions that would otherwise still flow into your reporting.
Customer Match. Upload hashed customer lists for suppression, lookalike expansion, and feeding high-LTV signals to Smart Bidding. One of the cleanest first-party signals available.
Value-based conversion tracking. Not all conversions are equal. A trial signup from a 50-person company is worth a fraction of a signup from a 500-person enterprise. Feeding conversion values (ideally profit-adjusted) into Google Ads is how you unlock Target ROAS and Maximize Conversion Value properly.
Agency angle: across the accounts I audit, most have at least one broken piece in this chain. The pattern repeats across industries. Before you can run the playbook, you need clean plumbing. Skip this section and everything else becomes guesswork dressed up as strategy.
For deeper structural thinking on how to organize campaigns once tracking is clean, see our guide on Google Ads account setup guide.
Manual CPC made sense in 2015. In 2026 it is a liability.
Google's AI evaluates millions of signals per auction in real time. Query, device, location, time of day, browser, operating system, recent behavior, audience overlap, historical conversion probability. A human adjusting bids weekly in a spreadsheet is not competing with another human. They are competing with a system that runs millions of micro-decisions an hour.
Here is the quick map of the Smart Bidding strategies worth knowing.
Target CPA. Default for B2B lead gen. You tell Google what you are willing to pay per conversion. AI hits that target across queries. Works best with clean tracking and a stable CPA goal.
Target ROAS. Revenue-focused. Set a return on ad spend target (e.g. 400%). AI bids hard on high-value conversions and backs off on low-value ones. Industry data shows switching from Target CPA to Target ROAS with the same constraint can lift conversion value by roughly 14%.
Maximize Conversions / Maximize Conversion Value. For when budget is not the constraint. Google spends the full budget chasing either conversion count or total value.
Value-based Smart Bidding. This is where most agencies are leaving money. Instead of "1 conversion = 1 point," you feed actual margin or LTV. A $200 trial that converts to a $20k annual contract gets weighted accordingly, and AI allocates spend toward the query-audience-placement combinations most likely to produce high-value deals, not just high-volume ones.
Case in point: HDFC ERGO, covered in published industry case studies, switched from Target CPA to Target ROAS on broad match and reported a traffic and sales boost without pushing CPA up. Simple mechanic: once AI had value signals, it bid harder on queries driving actual revenue and pulled back on the rest.
Two operational rules matter more than people think.
Respect the learning period. Smart Bidding takes 2 to 6 weeks to stabilize after a meaningful change. Aggressive manual intervention during that window resets the learning. Adjust target values within 10% of historical performance. Then leave it alone.
Manual layer still matters. Device bid adjustments, dayparting, geo-level nuance. AI handles the micro-auction, you own the macro strategy. Dayparting non-business hours on B2B, excluding low-conversion geos, dialing in device splits: still human calls.
The "AI handed me bad results" complaint I hear most often comes from accounts that changed bidding strategy, panicked at week two, and reverted. Week two sits roughly halfway through the learning period, which is exactly the point at which performance looks worst before it stabilizes.
If you want the opinionated take on where automation hurts more than helps, our piece on 5 AI myths killing agency profitability goes deeper on the Automation Layering concept.
Performance Max is the campaign type everyone has an opinion on. Half the ecosystem loves it. The other half has horror stories of budget burning on low-intent mobile app placements.
Both are right. The difference is governance.
What PMax actually is. A single AI-managed campaign unifying Search, YouTube, Display, Gmail, Discover, and Maps. You provide asset groups, audience signals, and a budget. Google's AI tests combinations across every surface and shifts spend toward whatever converts best.
Asset groups. Collections of headlines, descriptions, images, logos, videos, and product feeds. More assets means more combinations, more data for AI to optimize against.
Audience signals. Not hard targeting. A starting hypothesis. You tell AI "these are the people likely to convert" (customer lists, interests, demographics), and it uses that as a seed to find lookalike patterns.
Final URL expansion. AI routes traffic to the most relevant landing page on your site, even if you did not specifically target that URL. Useful for e-commerce catalogs. Risky if you have pages you do not want serving traffic.
Cross-channel budget optimization. The pitch: real-time shifting toward top-performing channels. The reality: works well when your product has genuine cross-channel demand, burns money when one channel (usually low-intent mobile apps) starts looking artificially cheap per conversion.
Power pairing. AI-powered Search with broad match alongside Performance Max gives full-funnel coverage. Search catches high-intent queries, PMax scales across the rest. Published case studies like Talley & Twine reporting around 300% ROI on full-stack AI-driven Google Ads, or Ed Hardy's reported 11x revenue and 1200% ROAS on AI-driven cross-channel, show the kind of compounding possible when the pieces lock together.
Here is the part nobody likes to say out loud about Performance Max.
Conversion inflation is real. PMax can (and often does) shift budget toward low-intent placements that produce technically-a-conversion but not the conversions your business actually cares about. Mobile app placements, made-for-advertising (MFA) sites, display networks where the "conversion" is a pixel fire from a bot or a misclicked interstitial.
Without governance, PMax is the fastest way to burn a client's budget on low-quality conversions and still show a "green" dashboard.
Governance looks like this: aggressive negative placements, regular audit of the placement report (now available in PMax), value-based conversion signals so AI weights quality correctly, and hard rules around where PMax should not run at all. Most pure B2B lead gen, for instance, benefits more from Search + RLSA than PMax.
For a deeper cut on running PMax without losing the steering wheel, see Performance Max with AI.
Creative is the area where AI has changed the economics of agency work most dramatically, and also the area where "AI slop" risk is highest.
Let's go through it properly.
Responsive Search Ads (RSAs). The standard Search format. You provide up to 15 headlines and 4 descriptions. AI tests combinations and serves whatever is working best for each query. Two RSAs per ad group is the current recommended baseline.
Ad Strength matters. Moving from "Poor" to "Excellent" Ad Strength correlates with approximately 12% more conversions. Ad Strength itself sits outside the direct ranking formula, but the signals it measures (headline uniqueness, keyword relevance, description variety) feed into actual performance.
Pinning sparingly. Pinning headlines locks them to position 1, 2, or 3. Useful for legal disclaimers, brand name, or compliance copy. Over-pinning kills the AI's ability to optimize combinations. Rule of thumb: pin only what you have to.
Asset Studio and Product Studio. Google's built-in creative AI suite. Background removal, image outpainting, resolution upscaling, product photo to dynamic video. For teams without a dedicated creative pipeline, this is leverage.
Dynamic Creative Optimization (DCO). Industry reports point to up to 80% reduction in creative production costs compared to manual workflows. DCO engines (Smartly.io, AdCreative.ai, Madgicx, Albert.AI, and similar platforms) generate and test thousands of creative variants automatically, then scale the winners.
Heinz "A.I. Ketchup" and Coca-Cola "Create Real Magic" are the two published campaign case studies worth studying. Heinz showed that even when you ask the generative AI to draw ketchup, it draws Heinz, because brand equity is literally baked into the model's training data. Coca-Cola turned the process inside out and invited the community to co-create ads using their own AI tools. Different use cases, same underlying point: creative AI is now a brand-level tool, not just a production shortcut.
Here is where the "AI slop" problem enters.
Raw AI output at scale is a losing strategy. Published studies on AI-written versus human-written ad copy consistently show lower CTR on the raw AI side once the novelty wears off, and consumers increasingly flag "feels like a bot" content as a reason to disengage. The exact percentage varies by study, but the direction is consistent.
The fix is what I call the Sandwich Method (borrowed from our 5 AI myths piece):
Skip the top layer and you get scaled mediocrity. Skip the bottom layer and you get polished mediocrity. The middle layer produces leverage only when the bread holds it together.
Agency angle: the teams producing work that actually converts in 2026 are treating AI as the execution layer, not the creative layer. The strategists and writers move up the stack. The junior "banged out 50 ad variants by hand" role gets absorbed into a prompt and a review loop. More on the shift in AI for marketing teams.
Targeting in 2026 is less about demographics and more about behavior, intent, and first-party signal. The lift you get from audience-aware bidding is often bigger than the lift from bidding strategy changes alone.
In-Market Segments. Active buyers, based on Google's signals about people researching purchases in the last 30 days. Strong layer for Search and YouTube.
Custom Audiences. Built around websites visited, apps used, recent search history (competitor research included). If someone searched a competitor's product last week, you can bid more aggressively on your own brand queries.
Remarketing lists. Minimum 1,000 users. Optimal range for meaningful patterns is 5,000 to 10,000+. Below that, focus on Customer Match and similar audiences instead.
Customer Match. Upload hashed emails, phone numbers, addresses. First-party signal AI uses directly to find your best customers and lookalikes. For B2B, this is how you target by job title and company size via your CRM.
Predictive Audiences and Lookalikes. Google's AI finds pattern-match prospects based on who already converted. This is where value-based conversion data (from Section 1) pays compounding returns. Feed AI high-value converter data, it finds more high-value lookalikes.
Demographics with bid adjustments. Age, income bracket, household composition. Device layer matters too. Demographic-based device bid adjustments (like doubling down on desktop for a high-income B2B segment) are one of those small dials that can move the number meaningfully on the right account.
Geo-performance analysis. Manhattan CPC is not Nebraska rural CPC, and conversion rates diverge even more. Geo-level bid adjustments informed by actual conversion data per region is one of the cleanest manual overlays still worth doing.
B2B-specific tactics. Customer Match with your CRM list segmented by company size, industry, seniority. Layer this with In-Market + Custom Audiences for precision approximating LinkedIn-style targeting at a fraction of the CPC.
The mindset shift: audiences are no longer "who you target." They are "how you tell AI which conversions to weight more heavily." That reframe changes how you build account structure.
The full library of AdLume skills: paid ads, landing pages, B2B leads, GTM tracking, e-commerce.
The bundle goes straight to your inbox, then one email a week. Unsubscribe in one click. We never share your address.
Broad match has a bad reputation that is 10 years out of date.
Old broad match (pre-2020) was a money pit. Modern broad match, paired with Smart Bidding and quality conversion signals, is a different animal. Industry data shows advertisers using broad match + Smart Bidding see around 35% more conversions compared to restricted match types.
The reason is mechanical: Smart Bidding at query level can bid aggressively on the high-intent variants inside a broad match query, and pull back on the irrelevant ones. It does this per-auction, across millions of signals. No human keyword list can match that granularity.
But here is the catch. Broad match without discipline is still a money pit. The discipline looks like this.
Keep exact match for your highest-value long-tail terms. Two to five word phrases where you already know the conversion rate is strong. Do not hand these to broad match, they are too valuable to generalize.
Phrase match as the bridge. Good for scaling known-good terms without the full aggressiveness of broad.
Broad match as the growth layer, only with Smart Bidding. Never broad match on manual CPC. You will hemorrhage budget.
Negative keywords are now your most important manual task. The one thing AI genuinely cannot do for you is know which search terms represent your brand's "do not want" list. Weekly Search Terms Report audit is mandatory. Minimum. Non-negotiable.
Dynamic Keyword Insertion. Insert the user's actual query into the headline. Dated tool, still useful in specific cases.
The SKAG debate is over. Google now recommends simpler, broader campaign structure, not hyper-segmented Single Keyword Ad Groups. AI optimizes at query level regardless of your structure, and over-segmentation actually hurts by splitting learning across too many low-volume ad groups.
Case study worth reading: tails.com (pet food subscription) reportedly drove a 182% signup increase in Germany using broad match + Smart Bidding + Responsive Search Ads, as documented in published Google case studies. The mechanic was not exotic. Clean conversion tracking, broad match exposed to AI, RSAs with strong creative. The fundamentals, executed without fear.
The counter-example, from one of our source deep dives, is what I call the $20k failed test. An advertiser flipped their campaign from Manual CPC to Maximize Conversion Value, got bad results in week two, and blamed AI. Real cause: no offline conversion tracking, insufficient historical conversion data for the AI to learn from, no learning-period buffer. The AI did not fail. The foundation failed.
Broad match without negatives is budget bleed. Broad match with weekly Search Terms Report reviews, negative lists, and quality conversion signals is where the 35% conversion lift lives.
For a workflow-level view, our 101 prompts for Google Ads includes ready-to-use prompts for Search Terms Report analysis.
This is the section most agencies get wrong, because it is the one that requires discipline, not tools.
Google's Optimization Score. Published data points to +10 points correlating with approximately 14% median conversion increase. Useful signal. Not every recommendation is worth applying. Auto-apply is a trap: it applies recommendations uniformly, including changes that hurt specific accounts. Review weekly, apply what fits strategy, dismiss the rest.
Data-Driven Attribution (DDA). Credits multiple touchpoints instead of only the last click. For any account with a sales cycle longer than a same-session purchase, DDA shows you touchpoints last-click attribution hides.
Incrementality testing. Total conversion counts tell you what happened. Incrementality tells you how many of those conversions would have happened anyway without the campaign running. Controlled experiments (geo holdouts, matched-market tests) are how you answer that question. Google Meridian, currently rolling out, will make this dramatically easier.
LTV tracking for B2B. Feed closed-deal revenue back via Offline Conversion Tracking. AI stops optimizing for "MQL that looked good on Tuesday" and starts optimizing for "MQL that became a $40k contract three months later."
A/B/n and multivariate testing at scale. Manual A/B tests are slow. AI-driven multivariate testing runs dozens of variants in parallel and identifies winners in days, not quarters.
Real-time anomaly detection. A 500% spend spike on a single placement overnight? Auto-pause rule triggers, Slack alert in the morning, budget protected. A few hours of setup that saves clients from silent disasters.
Now the part people ignore: the cadence itself.
Here is the honest math on where AI actually saves agency time. Industry research points to account managers burning 14.5 to 16 hours per week on manual reporting and data pulling. At a modest loaded hourly cost, that is roughly $11k/month per senior manager sunk into what I call the Hidden Factory: unbilled time fixing or building reports that should be automated.
AI-driven reporting collapses that hidden factory. The hours redirect to strategy, creative direction, client conversations, the actual high-value work. That is the real ROI of AI in agency ops, not "we saved 10% on bids."
More on the reporting economics in maximizing ROI with AI marketing.
This is where the abstract stops and the practical starts. Here is the five-step framework I use with teams implementing this at an account level, without boiling the ocean.
Step 1: Audit current data quality. Before touching AI features, audit conversion tracking, GA4 integration, offline conversion pipelines, LTV data availability. Most accounts have at least one broken link in this chain. Fix it first.
Step 2: Pick ONE pilot campaign. Not every campaign at once. One. Ideally a mid-spend, stable-performance campaign where you have clean data and reasonable room to test. Agencies that try to flip 20 campaigns simultaneously lose because they cannot isolate what worked and what did not.
Step 3: Set learning-period guardrails. Before launch, configure automated anomaly alerts. Rules like: CPA spikes 3x over baseline, spend spikes 5x on a single placement, conversion rate drops 50% in a day. These are your circuit breakers during the 2-6 week learning window. They let you leave AI alone to learn, while still protecting against genuine runaway scenarios.
Step 4: Layer human review weekly. Search Terms Report. Placement exclusions (especially for PMax). Creative refresh decisions. The weekly 30-60 min touch is non-negotiable. It is the one manual task AI cannot do for you, and it is where most "AI ran my budget into the ground" stories actually originate. No one was reviewing weekly.
Step 5: Scale across accounts only once the pilot validates. Once you have 2-3 months of clean data showing the pilot working, standardize the playbook and roll it across similar accounts. Do not automate chaos. Standardize first, then scale.
Here is the cost comparison most agencies do not want to publish, because it reveals an awkward truth about pricing models.
Traditional agency | % of spend + retainer | Weeks to months | Weekly manual | Variable |
|---|---|---|---|---|
In-house team | Salaries + tools + infra | Weeks to months | Daily manual | Good, labor-heavy |
AI-powered platform | Monthly subscription | Days to weeks | Real-time | Very high |
Traditional agencies charging a percentage of spend have a structural conflict of interest. The more they spend, the more they earn. AI compresses the hours needed to manage a well-structured account, which means the billable-hour model breaks. You now have a choice: either keep the old model and watch margin collapse as efficiency rises, or move to value-based pricing where you price the outcome, not the hours.
I have opinions on this (you can read agency scaling and profitability for the longer version), but the short version is: AI saves you 4 hours on an audit. Price the audit. Do not price the hours.
Team roles redefined. The agency of 2026 has fewer "button pushers" and more strategists. AI lowers the floor for execution (anyone can generate an RSA variant). It raises the ceiling for strategy (only a senior strategist knows which variant matches which buyer at which funnel stage). The Architect role gets more valuable. The pure-execution role gets compressed.
Break down silos. AI needs full-funnel signal to optimize end-to-end. If your data team, media team, and creative team do not talk to each other, AI is optimizing against a fragmented picture. The agencies winning this era are the ones forcing cross-functional visibility.
Honest positioning: AdLume runs most of this playbook automatically. The conversion tracking audit, the bidding diagnostic, the RSA strength check, the wasted-spend flags and the prioritized task list get generated in roughly 15 seconds against a 400+ point ruleset, with zero human touch on our side. Accounts with clean foundations plus the weekly human review layer on top consistently out-perform accounts running AI without guardrails. The whole thing is discipline encoded in software. Free for 14 days, no card. Try AdLume.
The current playbook is table stakes. The agencies reading this and thinking "we have most of this running" are the ones in position to leverage what is coming. Everyone else is playing catch-up on fundamentals.
Here is what to track over the next 12-18 months.
AI Overviews in Search. Google's AI-generated answers at the top of search results. Published data points to roughly 10% usage increase across major markets. Ads are now being tested inside AI Overviews. Placement, format, and trigger mechanics differ from traditional search ads.
Dimension | Traditional Search Ads | Ads in AI Overviews |
|---|---|---|
Placement | Above / alongside organic results | Inline within the AI answer |
Format | Standard text / asset combinations | Conversational, contextual integration |
Trigger | Keyword match | Query intent + AI relevance |
User context | Scanning results | Reading an answer |
Campaign types that currently appear inside AI Overviews: Performance Max, Shopping, and Search campaigns using broad match. The pattern is clear. AI-era campaign types get the AI-era placements.
AI Mode. Conversational search ads, where queries behave more like ChatGPT-style dialogue than keyword inputs. Expect ad formats to evolve toward conversational insertion.
AI Max for Search. Google's bundled feature set layering text customization, asset optimization, and generative ad creation on top of standard Search campaigns. Creative AI pushed deeper into the campaign workflow.
Meridian. Google's upcoming incrementality tool. Makes true lift measurement accessible without custom geo-experiment setups. Big deal for agencies currently faking incrementality analysis with last-click.
Agentic AI. The next wave. AI that plans ahead, runs its own creative tests, and adjusts strategy within guardrails you set. Moves past pure execution toward autonomous operation. Early stage. Worth tracking, not worth betting the account on yet.
Ad fraud prevention. Platforms like Lunio catching invalid click activity before it hits your reporting. Useful for Display-heavy accounts with higher bot exposure.
Competitor analysis AI. Tools like SpyFu exposing competitor ad spend estimates, keyword strategy, creative angles. Intelligence layer, not a strategy in itself.
Voice-prompted bidding. Tell an AI assistant your campaign goals, it adjusts bids accordingly. Sounds gimmicky today. Will be normal in 24 months.
Here is the uncomfortable framing. These features signal where the platform is heading, and they stack on the fundamentals. Agencies that have not implemented the current playbook (Sections 1 through 8) cannot leverage what is coming next. You cannot layer AI Overview optimization on top of a broken conversion tracking setup. You cannot use agentic AI to run your account if your account structure is a mess.
The work compounds. Get the current playbook right, and next year's features plug in. Skip the current playbook, and you will be twice as far behind twelve months from now.
For the broader trend picture on where AI and marketing are heading, the CEE agency benchmark is a useful read, and AI marketing ethics covers the guardrails side of the conversation.
If there is one thing worth taking from a 4,000-word article, it is this. AI in Google Ads compresses the mechanical parts of the job. Tracking, bidding, creative variants, reporting: all of it moves from hours of manual work to minutes of review. What expands is strategy, judgment, client conversation, the part that actually benefits from being human.
The teams figuring that out right now are the ones with the most runway going into the next two years.
If you are running Google Ads for clients, or in-house, and you have made it to the bottom of this article, here is the practical next step. Audit one account against the nine sections above. Where is the foundation broken? Where is the automation missing? Where is the human review layer absent? That audit, honestly done, is probably the most valuable 90 minutes you spend on ad ops this quarter.
If your team also runs paid social, the companion playbook is AI in Meta Ads: how to use Advantage+, creative AI, Conversions API, and guardrails without turning the account into a black box.
And if you want the next pieces in this series, drop your email below. Weekly, practical, no fluff.
Further reading from our playbook: 5 AI myths killing agency profitability, Agency scaling and the profitability trap, and the companion AI in Meta Ads agency playbook.
If you want production-ready tooling instead of starting from a blank prompt, our 20 Claude Skills for Google Ads repo packages the recurring diagnostics covered above as drop-in skills you can install in Claude Code.
Lumy is an AI assistant for managing Google Ads and Meta Ads campaigns. It analyses performance, detects wasted budget, and suggests optimisations, delivered directly into Slack, MS Teams, or HubSpot.
How much does Lumy cost?Lumy is not open for general signup yet, so there is no public price list today. The entry offer is 7-day Optimization. Join the waitlist and you will get pricing and access details when it opens.
Is broad match safe to use in Google Ads in 2026?Modern broad match paired with Smart Bidding and quality conversion data can outperform rigid exact-match structures. Without discipline it is still a money pit: keep exact match for high-value long-tail terms, never run broad match on manual CPC, and review the Search Terms Report weekly for negatives.
How long does Smart Bidding take to stabilize?Smart Bidding takes roughly 2 to 6 weeks to stabilize after a meaningful change. Aggressive edits during the learning period reset progress, which is where most 'AI handed me bad results' complaints come from.
Does Performance Max inflate conversion numbers?It can. PMax often shifts budget toward low-intent placements that produce cheap, low-quality conversions. Governance means aggressive negative placements, regular placement report audits, and checking conversion quality, not just conversion counts.
AdLume watches your ad accounts and brings the next fix to your team's tools.
One email, on the day access opens. Nothing else, and you can leave the list with one click.